In a surprising and controversial move, conservative commentator Candace Owens has publicly called on the National Football League (NFL) to distance itself from global pop star Taylor Swift. Owens, known for her outspoken political views and critiques of popular culture, claims that Swift’s “erratic behavior and statements go beyond acceptable limits” and could negatively impact the league’s image.

Owens’ Criticism of Swift

The controversy erupted after Owens took to social media to voice her disapproval of Swift’s growing influence in the NFL. Swift, who has been frequently spotted at Kansas City Chiefs games supporting her boyfriend, star tight end Travis Kelce, has been the subject of extensive media coverage. Her presence at NFL events has sparked both admiration from fans and criticism from detractors who believe that her influence extends beyond entertainment into areas of political and social activism.

Owens, in her statements, alleged that Swift’s actions and public statements—particularly those regarding politics—are detrimental to the NFL’s commitment to remaining neutral on social issues. She suggested that the pop star’s influence could alienate a significant portion of the NFL’s audience, which consists of a diverse demographic with varying political beliefs.

“Taylor Swift is using the NFL as a platform to promote her own agenda, and it’s dangerous,” Owens stated in a video shared on X (formerly Twitter). “Her erratic behavior, her insistence on involving herself in every major cultural moment, and her increasing political advocacy go beyond what is acceptable for a sports organization that should remain focused on the game.”

The Swift Effect on the NFL

Taylor Swift’s involvement with the NFL has been undeniable. Since the public revelation of her relationship with Travis Kelce, television ratings have spiked for Chiefs games, with networks capitalizing on Swift’s presence in the stands. Her mere attendance has been credited with drawing new viewers, particularly younger demographics and female fans, to the sport.

The so-called “Swift effect” has not only driven engagement but also led to increased merchandise sales, particularly in Kelce-related apparel. Reports suggest that Kelce’s jersey sales saw a dramatic surge, with many attributing the boost to Swift’s fanbase embracing the NFL as an extension of her cultural influence.

However, this growing presence has not been without controversy. Some traditional football fans argue that the media coverage of Swift at games is excessive, overshadowing the actual sport. Owens’ criticism taps into this sentiment, framing Swift’s influence as a distraction rather than an asset to the league.

Swift’s Political Influence and Owens’ Objections

A significant point of contention for Owens appears to be Swift’s political activism. In recent years, Swift has become increasingly vocal about her political beliefs, endorsing Democratic candidates and using her platform to encourage voter participation.

Owens, a staunch conservative, has frequently criticized celebrities who engage in political discourse, particularly those whose views lean left. In her latest remarks, she suggested that Swift’s outspokenness on political issues could steer the NFL into politically divisive territory.

“The NFL has always been a unifying force in American culture, bringing people together regardless of political affiliation,” Owens argued. “But with Taylor Swift at the center of so much media attention, we are seeing an agenda being pushed that does not belong in sports.”

Owens did not specify which of Swift’s statements or actions she found particularly “erratic,” but she has previously criticized the singer’s advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights, reproductive rights, and other progressive causes.

Reactions from Fans and the NFL

Unsurprisingly, Owens’ comments have been met with mixed reactions. Swift’s dedicated fanbase, often referred to as “Swifties,” quickly defended the singer, arguing that she has every right to attend NFL games and express her views. Many took to social media to ridicule Owens’ remarks, suggesting that her criticism was rooted in personal grievances rather than genuine concern for the NFL.

Others, particularly those who share Owens’ conservative viewpoint, echoed her sentiments, believing that Swift’s influence on the NFL is unnecessary and potentially harmful. Some sports commentators have also weighed in, questioning whether the excessive focus on Swift detracts from the essence of the game.

As for the NFL, the organization has not issued an official response to Owens’ comments. However, insiders suggest that the league sees Swift’s presence as a net positive, given the surge in viewership and engagement. With the Super Bowl approaching, many speculate that the NFL will continue to embrace Swift’s influence rather than distance itself from her.

What’s Next?

It remains to be seen whether Owens’ calls for the NFL to sever ties with Swift will gain traction. Given Swift’s unparalleled global influence and the evident economic benefits her presence has brought to the league, it is unlikely that the NFL will take any action against her.

Nonetheless, this incident highlights the ongoing intersection between pop culture, sports, and politics—an intersection that continues to generate heated debate. Whether one views Swift as an asset or a distraction to the NFL, there is no denying that her impact is significant.

For now, Swift seems unbothered by the controversy, continuing to support Kelce and enjoy the game. And as long as her influence remains profitable for the NFL, she is unlikely to be going anywhere anytime soon.